Two proposed bills in New Zealand:


  • The Gene Technology Bill
  • and the Glyphosate Maximum Residue Level (MRL) Increase Bill


Would pose serious risks to public health, food safety, and the environment.



Gene Technology Bill

 The Gene Technology Bill would deregulate oversight of gene-edited crops engineered for pesticide resistance. Independent studies show that such crops would lead to increased pesticide use, soil degradation, biodiversity loss, higher chemical residues in food, hormone disruption, cancer, and other chronic diseases.

Many countries, including EU member states, Japan, Australia, and Bhutan, already restrict or ban the cultivation of GMOs, reflecting global caution toward genetically modified crops.

These restrictions include strict labelling policies for GMO imports, such as in Japan, which does not export any GMO food.)


Glyphosate MRL Increase Bill

 The proposed Glyphosate MRL Increase Bill would allow up to 100 times more glyphosate residues in certain crops. Research indicates that glyphosate would accumulate in human tissues, disrupt gut health and hormones, impair cognition and behaviour in adolescents, and increase the risk of cancers such as non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

Around 20 countries, including Mexico, Vietnam, and EU nations, have banned or are phasing out glyphosate due to these documented risks.


Public Concern and Economic Impact

 Surveys show that 75–89% of New Zealanders want to avoid GMOs and sectors linked to environmental degradation.


These bills would threaten sustainable agriculture, organic markets, responsible investment, and eco-tourism—sectors that rely on New Zealand’s clean environment, biodiversity, and chemical-free food reputation.


Responsible Policy Alternatives

 New Zealand can support farmers while protecting public health and the environment. Investment in organic and regenerative farming, transparent food labelling, and stricter monitoring of chemical use would protect health, maintain biodiversity, and preserve New Zealand’s “clean, green” food reputation. It is a growing billion dollar industry.


(References here).


Green
December 9, 2025
A scientific paper assessing the safety of glyphosate, the active ingredient in Roundup, was formally retracted in 2025, 25 years after its publication. The 2000 study had concluded that glyphosate was safe for humans. The retraction followed evidence from court documents released in 2017 showing that company employees had contributed to the paper without being listed as authors — a practice known as ghostwriting. Despite these concerns being publicly known for several years, the journal did not issue a retraction until 2025. Before its withdrawal, the paper was widely cited and relied upon by regulators in assessing glyphosate’s safety. Its retraction highlights the importance of transparency, independence, and caution when research is used to inform public health and environmental policy. What is glyphosate? Glyphosate is the active ingredient in many weedkillers used in NZ, including Roundup. Roundup was originally developed by Monsanto, which has since been acquired by Bayer. Read more about independent research indicating harm associated with glyphosate use. C&EN: Glyphosate study from 2000 retracted amid corporate-influence concerns https://cen.acs.org/research-integrity/misconduct/Glyphosate-study-2000-retracted-amid/103/web/2025/12?utm_source=chatgpt.com
Man spraying weeds in a yard with a yellow backpack sprayer. Glyphosate causes health risks.
November 4, 2025
Glyphosate causes health risks, why NZ should limit and then work towards banning its use.
Field of dead crops with a glowing DNA helix overlay, implying genetic modification and harm in NZ
August 23, 2025
Many scientists warn of Genetic crop health issues and chemical dependance. NZ needs to say no to the Gene Technology an Glyphosate increase bills.
DeadMonarch butterfly on corn, tractor spraying field. Harmed by Gene tech crops
August 21, 2025
The New Zealand Government is promoting its Gene Technology Bill as an “update to match science and technology.” In reality, this law would deregulate genetically engineered (GE) crops in ways that ignore well-documented harms and global experience. Independent research and international case studies demonstrate that GE crops are not only failing to deliver safety promises but are also directly linked to ecological damage, health risks, and costly regulatory failures. An example of just one study's conclusion following chronic ultra-low dose Roundup exposure: "Our results suggest that chronic exposure to a GBH in an established laboratory animal toxicity model system at an ultra-low, environmental dose can result in liver and kidney damage with potential significant health implications for animal and human populations."
Drone spraying a field, with vegetables and grains in foreground. Text: Economic and Health Risks: Glyphosate, GMOs, and NZ's Food Bills.
August 18, 2025
Economic and Sectoral Risks There are economic risks: The Sustainable Business Council's members collectively represent NZ$169 billion in annual turnover. These Bills Could Threaten Key Sectors:
Person in hazmat suit spraying pesticide in a field.
August 18, 2025
If NZ raises glyphosate limits and weakens genetic safety laws, these risks including cancer, neurological, and hormonal impacts will increase, not decrease.